The University of Adelaide CENTRE FOR AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY RESEARCH

home   /   centre for automotive safety research   /   Publications   /   List   /   Details

Publication Details

TitleRisky behaviours - Preferable to crashes for evaluating road safety mass media campaigns?
AuthorsWundersitz LN, Hutchinson TP
Year2012
TypeConference Paper
AbstractDecades of research have failed to establish whether or not mass media advertising can reduce road crashes. The probable reason is that the random variability in crash numbers is too great (and, campaigns being very cheap per person reached, even low effectiveness may be enough to be worthwhile). Three alternatives to before-after comparison of crashes as the method of determining effectiveness of an intervention are discussed. These are real-world experiments of high methodological quality, laboratory experiments of the social psychological type, and the measurement of safety-related behaviors. The third of these, before-after comparison of behaviors or variables that can be objectively observed and are closely linked to safety, is suggested as the most promising. However, the behaviors that might plausibly be used as proxies for crashes are quite few in number, and there is an urgent research need to find more of them, together with theory implying that a change in the behavior does indeed mean a change in safety.
Conference NameAustralasian College of Road Safety "A Safe System: expanding the reach"
Conference AbbreviationACRS
Conference LocationSydney
Conference Date9-10 August 2012
NotesPaper available from ACRS website: http://acrs.org.au/events/acrs-past-conferences/2012-acrs-conference/program/papers/

Reference
Wundersitz LN, Hutchinson TP (2012). Risky behaviours - Preferable to crashes for evaluating road safety mass media campaigns?. Australasian College of Road Safety "A Safe System: expanding the reach", Sydney, 9-10 August 2012.